Feminism and Nigerian Girl Child Education




No group has ever spread lies or employed sophistries like MODERN FEMINIST GROUP. No group has ever spread hate between male and the female like this group. No group has ever caused dissension in families like this group. No group has ever had the highest number of brainwashed or deluded members like this group. In the quest for freedom, the modern woman has become a slave, clothed with chains forged by her own hands.
It is quite exasperating, to watch Nigerian women promote these feminist initiatives sponsored by wives of politicians who occupy positions in the Nigerian government. Surely when their husbands leave the seat, so also the feminist initiatives. Who still remembers the "Better Life for Rural Women" created by Mariam Babangida in 1986, or the most recent "Women for Change" Initiative by Dame Patience Jonathan. Go to the rural areas and see the real suffering of women, such as hunger, famine, to say the least. To them, it is no longer a battle of equality or supremacy over the male, but that of survival. How would they even enjoy the "benefits" of being feminist, when the proponents  spread their "hate-male" ideologies in fancy halls, attended by the high-class citizens. They briefly visit these rural areas for the sake of advertisement when election is around the corner.
Recently, we've watched groups both international and local advocating for a so-called "Education for Marginalized Girls." The real question is, What impact has the "Educated Women" made regarding the welfare of women in Nigerian.
What type education are these feminists advocating for? Is it this education system that reeks of immorality at its secondary and tertiary level. Are we not tired of the immoral videos and pictures, of our school girls at the secondary level, flooding  the internet? Is it a new story, that our girls in the tertiary level give in to the immoral demands of lecturers just to pass their courses?
Are we blind to the fact that almost all Nigerian female "celebrities" of immoral repute are educated under the same system advocated for these "marginalized" girls. Who are we mention or leave out of the list?
Caroline Samuel (Maheeda) is an educated woman, married and with a kid. Despite being married, she works as a nude model.
Judith Mazagwu(Afro Candy) is a porn-actress who graduated with B.sc. degree in Business Management.
Cossy Orjiakor, is not just a graduate of Accounting and Management at UNN, but also a Masters degree holder obtained from the University of Lagos .
And so on .
How do the feminist organizations respond to this deplorable situation in the system?
By distributing books and writing materials to the "marginalized" girls! What a way!
If only these feminists at large remove this "hate-male" content in their protests, they would realize that the coeducational (mixed) system is not suitable for a woman. They deserve a (gender) segregationist system of education at the secondary and tertiary level . In other words, it is not just a higher education TO women, but a higher education FOR women.
True Education primarily provides the needs and capacity of developing the mind. Considering the different mental constitution of both gender, it follows naturally that girls should be educated in a different school or college. A man's mind is logical and this makes courses like Mathematics or Engineering suitable for the man, while a woman's mind is intuitive and this makes courses like art, poetry, music etc. suitable for the woman. A woman can study the above mentioned "masculine courses", but this should not be done with the same intensity or degree to that of a man's. It's wrong or even harmful to teach both sexes the same subjects by the same methods in the same institution. Certain psychological needs of women are not met or totally missing in the coeducational curriculum for obvious reasons, but the failure of Co-ed system is a topic for another day.
I am what feminists call - A sexist. I believe a woman should summit to a man because it is a man's duty to protect and provide for her. He cannot carry out this duty if they are equals. There is a fine line between submission and slavery. A citizen who submits to the constituted authority is no slave, so also the wife.
No one can adequately provide for a woman more than the "Sexist".
I stand for a Segregationist Education For Women.
I stand for the Traditional Catholic Education.
Pax et Bonum.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Galileo and the False Accusations against the Catholic Church

Image
The Catholic Church being divine in institution is human in its instrumentality, therefore one would not expect its members to be perfect. As Ernest Hull S.J. puts it, "The Church is the school of the imperfect." If all men were perfect, there would be no need instituting a church. If there exist cases where the ever Church passed judgement in error, the case of Galileo is definitely NOT one of them. Sadly the Church is falsely accused, not just by Protestants but also by "Catholics" who tend to deny the dogma of Papal Infallibility and the papal impostor John Paul II falsely called "saint"  didn't seem to help matters in 1992. Although the Body of Christ - the Church - endures a litany of accusations regarding this issue, this article will refute the following errors: 1.) Galileo was persecuted by the Church for teaching Heresy, 2.) Considering the Galileo case, the Pope can never be infallible, 3.) This was a case of  "Science vs Theolo...
Read more

Deliver Them From Francis!

Image
Recently, Nope Francis  called for a change in translation of a phrase about temptation in the Lord's prayer. His suggestion was to use "do not let us fall into temptation" instead of "lead us not into temptation." According to him it should be, "Do not let me fall into temptation because it is I who fall, it is not God who throws me into temptation and then sees how I fall." He affirmed that "lead us not into temptation" is not a good translation. To a liberal or Novus Ordo Catholic, there is nothing wrong with the suggestion; but on the contrary, there is a problem. First, from the above statement, Francis is implying that God does not lead a soul to temptation. Secondly, his statement expresses  a total disregard, if not disbelief, in the teachings of the Catholic Church regarding the aforementioned phrase. Before stating my points, the following must be made clear. 1.)Temptation is simply a solicitation to evil, hence one can be...
Read more

Sins Against the Holy Ghost - Not Forgiven! - explanations.

Image
In giving explanations I will only stick to the basics , the reason being that I have no intention to present a theological treatise(of which I'm not even capable of.) The aim is to dispel the falsehoods and half-truths circulated in the Vatican II or Novus Ordo sect. In Matthew 12:32, it is written; "who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven either in this age, or in the next."  The Catholic Church presents the following as sins against the Holy Spirit: 1. Despair 2. Presumption 3. Impenitence 4. Obstinacy 5. Resisting the Known Truth 6. Envy of our brother's spiritual good Looking at the  above mentioned sins, one cannot say that he is entirely innocent of these sins. People sometimes lose hope in God's mercy (despair) while others presume and some others envy their brother's spiritual good. Does this mean that they have sinned against the Holy Spirit? Is all hope is lost for those who - still alive - has blasphemed against the H...
Read more